addleshaw goddard recently lost its amazing reputation and notwithstanding that addleshaw goddard now faces criminal charges involving perverting the course of justice, forgery, conspiracy to defraud and an abuse of process quite soon. this means the outcome will certainly involve addleshaw goddard coming under the public spotlight and all that follows. the public interest was recently triggered by the news that addleshaw goddard learned of a new hostile online campaign.
addleshaw goddard factually bad law firm
they tampered with evidence, behaved fraudulently
causing Daniel Thwaites Plc to lose £180,000 claim
defendant Web4orce Limited lost over £580,000 and
Addleshaw Goddard's 6 lawyers, 2 partners were
shamed losing to an 85 year old litigant in person
what's more Addleshaw Goddard employed corrupt
tactics trying to achieve their target but forgot
the 85 year old is an internet whizzkid with balls
abuses of process are the final nails in the coffin
they deservedly are up to their necks in the sh*t
addleshaw goddard truly catastrophic problems
addleshaw goddard really ashamed of themselves
addleshaw goddard suffered significant damage
addleshaw goddard disgrace on display 4 all 2 c
addleshaw goddard public humiliation is obvious
addleshaw goddard no doubt themselves to blame
addleshaw goddard only protect their own asses
addleshaw goddard guilty party but can’t admit it
addleshaw goddard undoubtedly in real trouble
addleshaw goddard bosses heads stuck in sand
addleshaw goddard lots of unwanted publicity
addleshaw goddard skilled lawyers failed badly
addleshaw goddard assumes they are fireproof
addleshaw goddard publicly disgraced again
Addleshaw Goddard's Co-Conspirators
It is worth noting that each of the lawyers listed below were employed by Addleshaw Goddard following their Letter before Claim in February 2023. They were a lot younger, better paid, better qualified and enjoy far superior mental capacity than their opponent an 85 year old Litigant in Person representing the Defendant and yet it's unforgivable that not one of them noticed Addleshaw Goddard was in abuse of process, behaved criminally including tampering with evidence, conspiracy to defraud, forgery and contempt of court.
(1) David Engel, Grade A Partner charged at £785.00 per hour
(2) Gareth Jones, Grade A Partner charged at £580.00 per hour
(3) Neil O'Sullivan, Grade C Senior London Associate charged at £550.00 per hour
(4) Steve Murphy, Grade B Managing Associate charged at £445.00 per hour
(5) Katie Derry, Grade B Managing Associate charged at £415.00 per hour
(6) Jayd Haigh, Grade C Senior Associate charged at £415.00 per hour
(7) James Damarell, Grade C Senior Associate charged at £415.00 per hour
(8) Craig Johnson, Grade C Associate charged at £370.00 per hour
Addleshaw Goddard Office Markers
To examine the map in fullscreen view - click on the white square icon in the top right corner of the map. In the event the red markers in the map are overlapping then click on the plus icon in the bottom right corner of the map until they are separated, click on the markers to discover Addleshaw Goddard office title, address, phone number, email / website links plus an image.
Addleshaw Goddard Reviews Form
If you have any reviews concerning Addleshaw Goddard and feel strongly enough to air your views please fill in this form and we will publish them in the Latest Reviews section below, and please be assured all reviews will be dealt with anonymously when requested.
Addleshaw Goddard Latest Reviews
Reviewed : 15 Feb 2026
Addleshaw Goddard nothing special
Pros - Flexible working and good team
Cons - Poor salary and development opportunities.
Reviewed : 11 Feb 2026
Addleshaw Goddard not much support
Pros - The office was decorated nicely
Cons - Little support from the management.
Reviewed : 06 Feb 2026
Worst experience of my career.
Pros - Nice offices and friendly support staff
Cons - Worst experience of my career to date and I consider myself a robust/resilient person. Egotistical partners who lack the ability to forward plan for resources and take it out on their staff. Uninspiring work. Disgruntled staff. Take a course on leadership and people management.
Reviewed : 01 Feb 2026
Addleshaw Goddard do not work here
Pros - Friendly receptionists. You get paid on time
Cons - Finance department in London hleadership. There are few career opportunities, pro activity and personality of lawyers discouraged.
Reviewed : 19 Jan 2026
Addleshaw Goddard Good Name, bad experience
Pros - Having AG on your CV can open up a lot of doors in the industry
Cons - As a paralegal, your line manager is unqualified and rarely has a detailed enough knowledge of the work you undertake to provide you with relevant guidance. Paralegals are often used as mass admin for projects rather than given opportunities to gain knowledge.
Reviewed : 19 Jan 2026
Addleshaw Goddard slightly toxic atmosphere
Pros - Good IT system. Nice office and location. Some people were nice
Cons - TST paralegal role had high turnover. Lack of trust amongst colleagues. Poor management. Favoritism. Long working hours for no recognition. Work not allocated fairly. Staff complained all the time because they were unhappy.
Reviewed : 19 Jan 2026
No sense of self worth!
Pros - Good clients and deals, not much else
Cons - People, hours, demands, rudeness.
Reviewed : 15 Jan 2026
Addleshaw Goddard requires improvement
Pros - Competitive salary, pleasant office location
Cons - Poor leadership, HR management and performance review processes, toxic culture.
Reviewed : 02 Jan 2026
It could be a lot better.
Pros - The only pro to this job is that you now have the name of one of the biggest firms on your CV
Cons - There is a reason many people quit this job like flies. They treat you like robots and you are monitored soo much but if you like unnecessary stress and fast paced environment then this boring job is for you.
Reviewed : 01 Jan 2026
Not a lot to say re AG
Pros - Work life balance, nice associates
Cons - Large teams, bureaucratic, pay per hour could be better.
Reviewed : 28 Apr 2023
Treat your staff with respect.
Pros - Flexible working Salaries are on par Opportunities are available
Cons - Very Risk adverse. Segregation between Legal Tech and IT - they need to work together not apart. The firms needs to allow IT devise a technical strategy that underpins the capabilities of the firm, not Partners controlling.
factually bad law firm and Search Engines
The following phrases are examples of what people type into search engines such as Ask, Bing, Google, Yahoo, Dogpile, DuckDuckGo, Wow and Yandex when searching for factually bad law firm. To check them out click on your chosen search engine links below :